Blog
About
PARINC.COM
MENU
CHECK OUT
Login
SEARCH
1-800-331-8378
Blog
About
PARINC.COM
Search
1.800.331.8378
PAR Author
,
PAR Staff
,
Practice
,
Products
Social/Emotional Evaluations: Unraveling the ED/SM Dilemma Part 2
May 2, 2017
Last week, we presented the first part of a two-part series on unraveling the ED/SM dilemma. This week, we talk to the experts on how to use various assessments to evaluate emotional disturbance and social maladjustment.
Catch up on last week's blog
here
.
School staff members often have difficulties when it comes to assessing a student who may have emotional disturbance (ED), and getting hard data to back up the decision can be just as difficult. PAR spoke with experts in the field about the use of various instruments that have proven to be useful in gathering the hard data needed in order to make an informed decision about ED eligibility.
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF2)
Peter K. Isquith, PhD, is a practicing developmental school neuropsychologist and instructor in psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. He’s the coauthor of the
BRIEF2
, the new
BRIEF2 Interpretive Guide
, and the
Tasks of Executive Control (TEC)
.
PAR: Why would it be helpful to include a measure of executive functioning in the assessment of a student being evaluated for an ED eligibility?
PI: In general, the purpose of including the BRIEF2 when asking about ED is to know whether or not the child actually has an emotional disturbance or if his or her self-regulation gives that appearance. So, if a child is referred who has frequent severe tantrums, we want to know if this is an emotional disturbance or if it is part of a broader self-regulatory deficit. That is, is the child melting down because he or she truly experiences emotional distress? Or is he or she doing so because of poor global self-regulation? To answer this, I would want to look at two things:
Is there evidence of an actual emotional concern? Does the child exhibit mood problems, anxiety, or other emotional issues?
And does the child's self-regulation have an impact on other domains, including attention, language, and behavior? That is, is he or she physically, motorically, attentionally, and/or verbally impulsive or poorly regulated?
If the first answer is yes, then there is likely an emotional disturbance. But if it is no, then there may be a self-regulatory issue that is more broad. By using the BRIEF2, clinicians can quickly learn if a student is impulsive or poorly regulated in other domains, not just emotionally. A BRIEF2 profile with high Inhibit and Emotional Control scales suggests that the child is more globally disinhibited. If it is primarily the Emotional Control scale that’s elevated, and there is an emotional concern like mood problems, then it may be more of an emotional disturbance.
Pediatric Behavior Rating Scale (PBRS)
Richard Marshall, EdD, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Educational and Psychological Studies in the College of Education at the University of South Florida. He is also an adjunct associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences at the USF College of Medicine. In addition to the PBRS, published in 2008, he is the author of 2011’s The Middle School Mind: Growing Pains in Early Adolescent Brains.
PAR: How does the PBRS fit into the diagnosis of ED?
RM: Two gaps in practice prompted us to develop the
PBRS
. The first was that the assessment instrument available at the time had few if any items about rage attacks, irritability, assaultive aggression, and other symptoms associated with early onset bipolar disorder. Hence, despite significantly abnormal behaviors, results of assessments were often within normal limits because they failed to capture symptoms of interest. So, our first goal was to include these new behaviors into parent and teacher ratings.
A second problem was that symptom overlap between ADHD and early onset bipolar disorder made it difficult to differentiate ADHD and bipolar disorder. The problem is that the standard treatment for ADHD, stimulant medication, induces mania in individuals with bipolar disorder. Thus, diagnosis accuracy is paramount.
What we learned during the PBRS norming sample was that students with ADHD and bipolar disorder produce a similar pattern of scores, but students with bipolar disorder produce a higher level of scores. That is, both groups have similar symptoms, but individuals with bipolar disorder have more serious symptoms. Thus, the PBRS can assist clinicians in differentiating individuals with mood disorders from those with ADHD.
PAR: Decades of research in cognitive neuroscience, combined with changes in our understanding and classification of mental illness in children, impels us to continually reevaluate theory and practice. Formulated more than a half-century ago, the idea of social maladjustment is one of those policies in desperate need of revision. In 1957, the idea of being able to identify students who were socially maladjusted may have seemed reasonable.
RM: There are two problems with this idea. First, the government has never defined social maladjustment, and states (and practitioners) have been left without clear ways of differentiating students who are or are not socially maladjusted. Second, without a clear definition, the concept of social maladjustment has created what Frank Gresham refers to as a “false dichotomy” that is used to exclude students from receiving interventions that would help them and to which they are entitled.
Emotional Disturbance Decision Tree (EDDT)
Bryan Euler, PhD, author of the
EDDT
as well as the
EDDT Parent Form
and the new
EDDT Self-Report Form
, has a background in clinical and counseling psychology, special education, and rehabilitation counseling. He has 27 years of experience as a school psychologist working in urban and rural settings with multicultural student populations.
PAR: Can you describe the overall benefits of the EDDT system and what makes it unique from other instruments?
BE: The EDDT series was designed to map directly onto the IDEA criteria for emotional disturbance, which are different from and broader than constructs such as depression or conduct. The federal criteria are, some might say, unfortunately wide and “fuzzy,” rather than clean-cut. The EDDT scales are written to address these broad domains thoroughly and help school psychologists apply the unwieldy criteria.
The EDDT also includes a social maladjustment scale (SM). Since students who are only SM are not ED eligible, the EDDT is useful in ruling out these students and in identifying those for whom both conditions may be present. This can be helpful with program decisions, so children or adolescents who are primarily “fragile” are not placed in classrooms with those who have both depression/anxiety and severe aggression.
The EDDT also has an Educational Impact scale, which helps to document that the student’s social-emotional and behavioral issues are having educational effects, which IDEA requires for eligibility. All of the EDDT forms include a Severity scale, which helps to gauge this and guide service design.
The EDDT Parent and Self-Report forms also include Resiliency and Motivation scales, which help to identify a student’s strengths and determine what may most effectively modify his or her behavior. The presence of all these factors in the EDDT scales is intended to facilitate the actual practice of school psychology with ED and related problems.
PAR: Why is it important to have multiple informants as part of an evaluation?
BE: Having multiple informants is, in effect, one way of having multiple data sources. Multiple data sources add incremental validity, or accuracy, to evaluations as well as breadth of perspective. A rough analogy might be to lab tests, which are often done in panels, or multiples, rather than in singles, to help with insight, efficiency, and decisions.
PAR: What are the benefits of having the student perspective as part of an evaluation with multiple informants?
BE: Having a student’s perspective on his or her behavior and social-emotional adjustment is a critical but sometimes overlooked component of assessment, especially for ED and ADHD evaluations. If only teacher anecdotal reports, teacher-completed ratings, and behavior observations are used, this vastly increases the chance that the evaluation will be skewed toward externalized behavior like aggression and rule-breaking. Internal factors such as depression or anxiety, which may be causing the behavior, will be deemphasized, if noted at all. Research corroborates that if teachers rate a student, and ratings are also obtained from the parent and the child, the teacher results tend to highlight difficult, disruptive behavior, while other ratings may result in other insights. Relatedly, in children and adolescents, depression is often primarily manifest in irritability or anger rather than sadness. If there is no observable sadness and only problem behavior, teacher ratings may understandably focus on what stands out to them and complicates classroom management.
Even if students minimize their depression, anxiety, or social problems, they do sometimes rate one or more of these as “at risk.” This can provide a window into subjective emotional pain that may otherwise be obscured. Finally, gathering student-derived data enhances school psychology professional practice. Psychologists who complete child custody or juvenile corrections evaluations gather data directly from the child to facilitate insight, which can also aid in school psychology.
Adolescent Anger Rating Scale (AARS)
Darla DeCarlo, Psy S, has been a clinical assessment consultant with PAR for nine years. She is a licensed mental health counselor and certified school psychologist in the state of Florida.
PAR: Can you speak about your use of the
AARS
in ED evaluations?
DD: Within the context of assessing those students referred for behavior-related evaluations, I found the AARS to be a great compliment to the various other instruments I used during the evaluation process. Making an ED determination is a sensitive issue, and I wanted as much hard data as possible to help me make a well-informed decision. The AARS allowed me to assess a student’s level of anger and his or her response to anger through a self-report. Limited instruments are able to give clinicians information that can help them look at the ED/SM issue. The AARS helped me identify students who were at risk for diagnoses of conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, or ADHD. Combine these results with results on the EDDT and other instruments, and I was able to get a good picture (not to mention some hard data) on whether SM factored into the student’s issues.
PAR: What about interventions? Does the AARS help with that in any way?
DD: Anger control, as defined by the AARS, “is a proactive cognitive behavioral method used to respond to reactive and/or instrumental provocations. Adolescents who display high levels of anger control utilize the cognitive processes and skills necessary to manage anger related behaviors.”
What I liked about the instrument is that it qualifies the type of anger the student is displaying and then gives the clinician information about whether or not the student displays anger control or even has the capacity for anger control. As a school psychologist, I needed to know if the student already had the skills to follow through with some of the possible interventions we might put in place or if we needed to teach him or her some skills before attempting the intervention. For example, something as simple as telling a student to count to 10 or walk away when he or she feels anger escalating may seem like an easy task, but not all students recognize the physiological symptoms associated with their outbursts. Therefore, asking them to recognize the symptoms and then act by calming themselves is pointless. I have seen this mistake many times, and have made the mistake myself by suggesting what I thought was a useful and effective intervention, only to find out later that the intervention failed simply because the student did not possess the skills to perform the task. The AARS gave me information that helped guard against making this type mistake.
As with every evaluation, the instruments we choose in our assessments are important, but even the best instrument is useless without the keen skills of well-trained school staff to properly administer and interpret results with accuracy and precision.
Categories
About PAR (105)
Advocacy (66)
Books (8)
Community PARtners (48)
Conference (53)
Contest (3)
Discounts (17)
General (17)
Meet the Author (26)
Movies (1)
New Products (133)
PAR Author (68)
PAR Staff (43)
Practice (161)
Products (167)
Research (164)
Training (32)
Training Portal (8)
Uncategorized (7)
Webinar (21)
White Paper (4)
Archives
2024
January (3)
February (4)
March (5)
April (3)
May (5)
June (3)
July (2)
2023
January (4)
February (4)
March (4)
April (2)
May (5)
June (4)
July (3)
August (4)
September (3)
October (5)
November (4)
December (1)
2022
January (2)
February (4)
March (5)
April (4)
May (4)
June (4)
July (3)
August (4)
September (3)
October (4)
November (5)
December (4)
2021
January (4)
February (4)
March (5)
April (6)
May (4)
June (5)
July (4)
August (5)
September (5)
October (4)
November (6)
December (5)
2020
January (4)
February (4)
March (5)
April (2)
May (3)
June (5)
July (4)
August (4)
September (5)
October (5)
November (5)
December (5)
2019
January (4)
February (4)
March (4)
April (5)
May (4)
June (4)
July (5)
August (4)
September (4)
October (5)
November (4)
December (5)
2018
January (5)
February (4)
March (4)
April (4)
May (5)
June (4)
July (5)
August (4)
September (4)
October (5)
November (3)
December (4)
2017
January (5)
February (4)
March (4)
April (4)
May (5)
June (4)
July (4)
August (4)
September (4)
October (5)
November (4)
December (3)
2016
January (4)
February (4)
March (5)
April (4)
May (5)
June (4)
July (3)
August (5)
September (6)
October (4)
November (5)
December (4)
2015
January (7)
February (4)
March (6)
April (4)
May (4)
June (5)
July (4)
August (4)
September (5)
October (4)
November (4)
December (5)
2014
January (4)
February (4)
March (4)
April (5)
May (4)
June (4)
July (5)
August (4)
September (4)
October (5)
November (4)
December (5)
2013
January (5)
February (4)
March (4)
April (5)
May (4)
June (4)
July (5)
August (4)
September (4)
October (5)
November (5)
December (5)
2012
January (5)
February (4)
March (5)
April (5)
May (5)
June (4)
July (6)
August (4)
September (5)
October (6)
November (4)
December (4)
2011
January (4)
February (4)
March (5)
April (3)
May (6)
June (5)
July (5)
August (5)
September (4)
October (5)
November (5)
December (4)
2010
May (4)
June (3)
July (5)
August (4)
September (2)
October (3)
November (3)
December (3)
Contact PAR
Customer Support:
1.800.331.8378
Tech Support:
1.800.899.8378
Email:
cs@parinc.com
Website:
www.parinc.com
Recent Posts
July: Focus on Minority Mental Health
The State of Psychology Education
Coming Soon: A New PAR Website
What’s coming from PAR
The Latest Advancements in Alzheimer’s Disease
Read More »
Tags
online assessment
AAB
alzheimer's
APA
assessment
authors
autism
brief2
career
career counseling
ChAMP
children
Community PARtners
concussion
dementia
depression
dyslexia
emotional disturbance
executive function
FAR
Feifer
free training
intelligence
John Holland
learning disabilities
memory
mental health
NASP
neuropsychology
online assessment
PAI
par
PARiConnect
personality
philanthropy
Psychology
ptsd
reading
research
school psychology
SDS
Self-Directed Search
suicide
teleassessment
telehealth
training
training portal
trauma
United Way
webinar